290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16022698)
1. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of variability and uncertainty using mixture distributions: evaluation of sample size, mixing weights, and separation between components.
Zheng J; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 15209930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
Hofer E
Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accounting for both random errors and systematic errors in uncertainty propagation analysis of computer models involving experimental measurements with Monte Carlo methods.
Vasquez VR; Whiting WB
Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1669-81. PubMed ID: 16506991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
Marques TA
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjusting for measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
Mallick R; Fung K; Krewski D
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12846486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
Stayner L; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Stram DO; Deltour I; Gilbert SJ; Howe G
Radiat Res; 2007 Dec; 168(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 18088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QMRA and decision-making: are we handling measurement errors associated with pathogen concentration data correctly?
Schmidt PJ; Emelko MB
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 20851444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Particle and microorganism enumeration data: enabling quantitative rigor and judicious interpretation.
Emelko MB; Schmidt PJ; Reilly PM
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20121082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization.
van der Voet H; Slob W
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):351-71. PubMed ID: 17511703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty in allometric exponent estimation: a case study in scaling metabolic rate with body mass.
Hui D; Jackson RB
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):168-77. PubMed ID: 17720203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.
Phillips CV
Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12843772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
Puncher M; Birchall A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian modeling of measurement errors and pesticide concentration in dietary risk assessments.
Kennedy M; Hart A
Risk Anal; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19645757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement error in a random walk model with applications to population dynamics.
Staudenmayer J; Buonaccorsi JP
Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1178-89. PubMed ID: 17156293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainty calculations for the measurement of in vivo bone lead by x-ray fluorescence.
O'Meara JM; Fleming DE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2449-61. PubMed ID: 19336842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
Bartley DL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis of a two-dimensional quantitative microbiological risk assessment: keeping variability and uncertainty separated.
Busschaert P; Geeraerd AH; Uyttendaele M; Van Impe JF
Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1295-307. PubMed ID: 21418082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
