312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16022991)
1. Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
Hsu CC; Chao CK; Wang JL; Hou SM; Tsai YT; Lin J
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):788-94. PubMed ID: 16022991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18391719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study.
Kim YY; Choi WS; Rhyu KW
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22336467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of insertional temperature on the pullout strength of pedicle screws inserted into thoracic vertebrae: an in vitro calf study.
Tosun B; Snmazçelik T; Buluç L; Cürgül I; Sarlak AY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):E667-72. PubMed ID: 18758347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loosening of sacral screw fixation under in vitro fatigue loading.
Lu WW; Zhu Q; Holmes AD; Luk KD; Zhong S; Leong JC
J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 11117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pullout analysis of a lumbar plate with varying screw orientations: experimental and computational analyses.
Rios D; Patacxil WM; Palmer DK; Williams PA; Cheng WK; Inceoğlu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E942-8. PubMed ID: 22433507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical tests and finite element models for bone holding power of tibial locking screws.
Hou SM; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Chao CK; Lin J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Aug; 19(7):738-45. PubMed ID: 15288461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual-core pedicle screws after repeated insertion.
Defino HL; Rosa RC; Silva P; Shimano AC; Albuquerque de Paula FJ; Volpon JB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):1187-91. PubMed ID: 22880208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of repetitive pilot-hole use on the insertion torque and pullout strength of vertebral system screws.
Defino HL; Rosa RC; Silva P; Shimano AC; Volpon JB; de Paula FJ; Schleicher P; Schnake K; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):871-6. PubMed ID: 19531995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison study of the pullout strength of conventional spinal pedicle screws and a novel design in full and backed-out insertions using mechanical tests.
Amaritsakul Y; Chao CK; Lin J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Mar; 228(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 24496916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae.
Lill CA; Schneider E; Goldhahn J; Haslemann A; Zeifang F
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):686-94. PubMed ID: 16865403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.
Abshire BB; McLain RF; Valdevit A; Kambic HE
Spine J; 2001; 1(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 14588297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
