These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16023780)

  • 1. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable?
    Yazicioglu F; Gökdogan A; Kelekci S; Aygün M; Savan K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16023780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.
    Sevket O; Ates S; Molla T; Ozkal F; Uysal O; Dansuk R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24680843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.
    Tekelioğlu M; Karataş S; Güralp O; Murat Alınca C; Ender Yumru A; Tuğ N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):943-947. PubMed ID: 31146610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section: is it preventable by intraoperative digital dilatation of the internal cervical ostium?
    Yazicioglu HF; Sevket O; Ekin M; Ozyurt O; Aygun M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 74(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 22832395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Stegwee SI; Jordans I; van der Voet LF; van de Ven PM; Ket J; Lambalk CB; de Groot C; Hehenkamp W; Huirne J
    BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 29215795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.
    Yasmin S; Sadaf J; Fatima N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Sep; 21(9):522-6. PubMed ID: 21914406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
    Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in assessment of the impact of selected obstetric risk factors on cesarean scar niche formation: the case-controlled study.
    Budny-Winska J; Zimmer-Stelmach A; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 33757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Ceci O; Scioscia M; Bettocchi S; Cantatore C; Nardelli C; Laera A; Vimercati A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 18238987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uterine Scar Evaluation during the Postpartum: Pleading for Extradecidual Suturing during Cesarean Section.
    Kesrouani AK; Abdelkhalek Y; Abdallah W; Chaccour C; Hatoum I; Richa F
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1357-e1361. PubMed ID: 36720259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
    Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study.
    Sumigama S; Sugiyama C; Kotani T; Hayakawa H; Inoue A; Mano Y; Tsuda H; Furuhashi M; Yamamuro O; Kinoshita Y; Okamoto T; Nakamura H; Matsusawa K; Sakakibara K; Oguchi H; Kawai M; Shimoyama Y; Tamakoshi K; Kikkawa F
    BJOG; 2014 Jun; 121(7):866-74; discussion 875. PubMed ID: 24666658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture.
    Ceci O; Cantatore C; Scioscia M; Nardelli C; Ravi M; Vimercati A; Bettocchi S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 22612785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlations between sonographically measured and actual incision site thickness of lower uterine segment after repeated caesarean section.
    Indraccolo U; Scutiero G; Matteo M; Mastricci AL; Barone I; Greco P
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 25909490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The trauma of the hysterotomy incision].
    Negura A; Gavrilita L; Ardeleanu D
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Mar; 83(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 3285443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.