BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16023867)

  • 1. Sound frequency change detection in fetuses and newborns, a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Draganova R; Eswaran H; Murphy P; Huotilainen M; Lowery C; Preissl H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 16023867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial magnetoencephalographic study of fetal and newborn auditory discriminative evoked responses.
    Draganova R; Eswaran H; Murphy P; Lowery C; Preissl H
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Mar; 83(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 16863685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of auditory evoked fields in human fetuses and newborns: a longitudinal MEG study.
    Holst M; Eswaran H; Lowery C; Murphy P; Norton J; Preissl H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1949-55. PubMed ID: 16005681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newborns discriminate novel from harmonic sounds: a study using magnetoencephalography.
    Sambeth A; Huotilainen M; Kushnerenko E; Fellman V; Pihko E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 16426892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Change detection in newborns using a multiple deviant paradigm: a study using magnetoencephalography.
    Sambeth A; Pakarinen S; Ruohio K; Fellman V; van Zuijen TL; Huotilainen M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):530-8. PubMed ID: 19211303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change.
    He C; Hotson L; Trainor LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):218-29. PubMed ID: 18722392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
    Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal auditory responses to external sounds and mother's heart beat: detection improved by Independent Component Analysis.
    Porcaro C; Zappasodi F; Barbati G; Salustri C; Pizzella V; Rossini PM; Tecchio F
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1101(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16784726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority of repetitive adaptation to mismatch response following undiscriminable auditory stimulation: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Hoshiyama M; Okamoto H; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 25(3):854-62. PubMed ID: 17328780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal magnetoencephalography--a multimodal approach.
    Eswaran H; Lowery CL; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H
    Brain Res Dev Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 154(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 15617755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
    Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newborn infants process pitch intervals.
    Stefanics G; Háden GP; Sziller I; Balázs L; Beke A; Winkler I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):304-8. PubMed ID: 19131275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple wavelet-based test for evoked responses.
    Norton JD; Eswaran H; Lowery CL; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Sep; 138(1-2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
    Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential cerebral reactivity to shortest and longer tones: neuromagnetic and behavioral evidence.
    Cheng CH; Hsu WY; Shih YH; Lin HC; Liao KK; Wu ZA; Lin YY
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20600746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.