594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16024331)
1. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External quality assessment of automated hematology analyzer performance using fresh human blood samples in Shanghai.
Xiaobo H; Yong L; Daming J; Lei X; Ying S; Jinfeng Z
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 14521326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Current status and proposal of a guideline for manual slide review of automated complete blood cell count and white blood cell differential].
Woo HY; Shin SY; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Lee YK; Chae SL; Chang YH; Choi JR; Han K; Cho SR; Kwon KC
Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 30(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 21157139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and optimization of criteria for manual smear review following automated blood cell analysis in a large university hospital.
Pratumvinit B; Wongkrajang P; Reesukumal K; Klinbua C; Niamjoy P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 137(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 23451752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Miles Technicon H.2 automated hematology analyzer.
Health Devices; 1992 Nov; 21(11):387-419. PubMed ID: 1428895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in detecting blasts between ADVIA 2120 and Beckman-Coulter LH750 hematology analyzers.
Shelat SG; Canfield W; Shibutani S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 2):113-6. PubMed ID: 20447241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new point of care automated complete blood count (CBC) analyzer in various clinical settings.
Rao LV; Ekberg BA; Connor D; Jakubiak F; Vallaro GM; Snyder M
Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Mar; 389(1-2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18187044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell.
La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following four different series of hematology analyzer in a Chinese large scale hospital.
Cui W; Wu W; Wang X; Wang G; Hao YY; Chen Y; Luo D; Shou WL; Zhang S; Xiang XF; Si YZ; Chen Q; Cai H; Li T; Shen H; Shang K; Zhang YQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(22):3231-7. PubMed ID: 21163121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.
Pierre RV
Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):279-97. PubMed ID: 11933579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hematology without the numbers: in-clinic blood film evaluation.
Allison RW; Meinkoth JH
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 Mar; 37(2):245-66, vi. PubMed ID: 17336674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Refining the white blood cell differential: the first flow cytometry routine application.
Roussel M; Benard C; Ly-Sunnaram B; Fest T
Cytometry A; 2010 Jun; 77(6):552-63. PubMed ID: 20506466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hematology laboratory standardization: a plan for harmonization in Asia.
Bunyaratvej A; Tatsumi N; Funahara Y
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():182-4. PubMed ID: 10926281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can the 72-hour rule based on "Blast/Abn Lymph" flag on Sysmex XN-10 optimize the workflow in hematology laboratory?
Paridaens H; Sabor L; Simar J; Ronez E; Cornet E; Defour JP
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Aug; 77(4):422-428. PubMed ID: 31418703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability and reproducibility of ADVIA 120-measured red blood cell and platelet parameters in dogs, cats, and horses, and the use of reticulocyte haemoglobin content (CH(R)) in the diagnosis of iron deficiency.
Prins M; van Leeuwen MW; Teske E
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2009 Apr; 134(7):272-8. PubMed ID: 19431960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy, precision and clinically acceptable level of complete blood cell count by an automated multichannel hematology analyzer].
Kawai Y; Takeuchi K; Shimizu N; Uehara S; Nakayama Y; Mitsuhashi T; Watanabe K
Rinsho Byori; 1999 Apr; 47(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 10340008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
