These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get? Stephens KU South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial techniques of procreation: legal and moral aspects. Shifman P Isr Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):600-9. PubMed ID: 14682331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Belgian law on medically assisted reproduction and the disposition of supernumerary embryos and gametes. Pennings G Eur J Health Law; 2007 Nov; 14(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 18229762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Catholic teaching and the law concerning the new reproductive technologies. Alvare HM Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 15868664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Law 25/2003, of 21 November, modifying Law 35/1988, of 22 November, concerning assisted reproduction techniques]. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):255-66. PubMed ID: 15032108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine. Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The religious response to reproductive technology. Greil AL Christ Century; 1989 Jan 4-11; 106(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16127845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology. Katz GA Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproduction--Islamic views on the science of procreation. Ahmad NH Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Mar; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 17117542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adventism and assisted procreation: excerpts from a panel discussion at LLU. Larson D; Winslow G; Corselli J; Whitney E; Orr R; Brock B Update; 1996 Feb; 12(1):E1. PubMed ID: 16130250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on Canadian proposals. Morgan D Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; (81):13-5. PubMed ID: 15997537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The donation of gametes and embryos]. Merlet F Rev Prat; 2014 Jan; 64(1):97-8. PubMed ID: 24649558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership. Silver LM; Silver SR Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction. Brenwald ML; Redeker K Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "What is an embryo?": a legal perspective. Crockin SL Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1177-86. PubMed ID: 15868681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts. Triber GA Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]