172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16025543)
1. Power calculations for preclinical studies using a K-sample rank test and the Lehmann alternative hypothesis.
Heller G
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2543-53. PubMed ID: 16025543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power and sample size calculations for exact conditional tests with ordered categorical data.
Hilton JF; Mehta CR
Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):609-16. PubMed ID: 8369392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
Halabi S; Singh B
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A two-sample censored-data rank test for acceleration.
Breslow NE; Edler L; Berger J
Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 6534408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size determination for testing equality in Poisson frequency data under an AB/BA crossover trial.
Lui KJ
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 23364859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large sample tests for binary outcomes in fixed-dose combination drug studies.
Wang SJ; Hung HM
Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 9192448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
Correa JA; Bellavance F
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A likelihood ratio test for cancer screening trials.
Self SG; Etzioni R
Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 7766795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.
Mazumdar M; Liu A
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):727-39. PubMed ID: 12587102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size determination in clinical trials with multiple co-primary binary endpoints.
Sozu T; Sugimoto T; Hamasaki T
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2169-79. PubMed ID: 20687162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power calculations for survival analyses via Monte Carlo estimation.
Richardson DB
Am J Ind Med; 2003 Nov; 44(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 14571517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some circumstances.
Hewitt CE; Torgerson DJ; Miles JN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1004-8. PubMed ID: 18411038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-stage test of independence using Kendall's statistic.
Spurrier JD; Hewett JE
Biometrics; 1980 Sep; 36(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 7213913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tests for 2 x K contingency tables with clustered ordered categorical data.
Jung SH; Kang SH
Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 11241576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
