365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026435)
1. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection and prediction of breast cancer using double phase Tc-99m MIBI scintimammography in comparison with MRI.
Kim IJ; Kim YK; Kim SJ
Onkologie; 2009 Oct; 32(10):556-60. PubMed ID: 19816071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of scintimammography as an additional test to conventional mammography in detection of breast cancer].
Cwikła JB; Buscombe JR; Kolasińska AD; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
Ginekol Pol; 2003 May; 74(5):362-70. PubMed ID: 12931463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers.
Bilimoria KY; Cambic A; Hansen NM; Bethke KP
Arch Surg; 2007 May; 142(5):441-5; discussion 445-7. PubMed ID: 17515485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Wasif N; Garreau J; Terando A; Kirsch D; Mund DF; Giuliano AE
Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 19886147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and scintimammography in detection of primary breast cancer related size of the tumour.
Cwikła JB; Buscombe JR; Chaberek S; Holloway B; Parbhoo S; Hilson AJ
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2000; 3(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 14600905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.
Brem RF; Ioffe M; Rapelyea JA; Yost KG; Weigert JM; Bertrand ML; Stern LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 19155397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MRI-guided biopsy of suspicious abnormalities in the breast].
Meeuwis C; van den Bosch MA; Houwert KA; Fernandez-Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Mali WP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Aug; 150(32):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16948241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Lo GG; Ai V; Chan JK; Li KW; Cheung PS; Wong TT; Ma M; Lee R; Chien D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19188787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
