85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026690)
1. Assessment of the value of confirming responses in clinical trials in oncology.
Perez-Gracia JL; Muñoz M; Williams G; Wu J; Carrasco E; Garcia-Ribas I; Peiro A; Lopez-Picazo JM; Gurpide A; Chopitea A; Martín-Algarra S; García-Foncillas J; Blatter J
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Jul; 41(11):1528-32. PubMed ID: 16026690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods of joint evaluation of efficacy and toxicity in phase II clinical trials.
Tournoux C; De Rycke Y; Médioni J; Asselain B
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):514-24. PubMed ID: 17331808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria.
Bogaerts J; Ford R; Sargent D; Schwartz LH; Rubinstein L; Lacombe D; Eisenhauer E; Verweij J; Therasse P;
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):248-60. PubMed ID: 19095437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase II stopping rules that employ response rates and early progression.
Goffin JR; Tu D
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(22):3715-20. PubMed ID: 18669457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative designs of phase II trials considering response and toxicity.
Jin H
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 17428744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design of Phase II cancer trials for evaluation of cytostatic/cytotoxic agents.
Kocherginsky M; Cohen EE; Karrison T
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 19384693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stable disease is a valid end point in clinical trials.
Tolcher AW
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 19826356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. P-value calculation for multistage phase II cancer clinical trials.
Jung SH; Owzar K; George SL; Lee T
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(6):765-75; discussion 777-83. PubMed ID: 17146978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors].
Duffaud F; Therasse P
Bull Cancer; 2000 Dec; 87(12):881-6. PubMed ID: 11174117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response rates: a valuable signal of promising activity?
Pivot X; Thierry-Vuillemin A; Villanueva C; Bazan F
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 19826354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multinomial phase II cancer trials incorporating response and early progression.
Zee B; Melnychuk D; Dancey J; Eisenhauer E
J Biopharm Stat; 1999 May; 9(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 10379698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risks and benefits associated with novel phase 1 oncology trial designs.
Koyfman SA; Agrawal M; Garrett-Mayer E; Krohmal B; Wolf E; Emanuel EJ; Gross CP
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 17628485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment "RECIST"].
Sasaki T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Dec; 27(14):2179-84. PubMed ID: 11142160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials.
Pazdur R
Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():19-21. PubMed ID: 18434634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criticism of tumor response criteria raises trial design questions.
Twombly R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(4):232-4. PubMed ID: 16478740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.
Hoos A; Parmiani G; Hege K; Sznol M; Loibner H; Eggermont A; Urba W; Blumenstein B; Sacks N; Keilholz U; Nichol G;
J Immunother; 2007 Jan; 30(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17198079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
