These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026750)

  • 1. The response-cued completion hypothesis and the nature of residual cost in regular switch.
    González A; Milán EG; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):327-41. PubMed ID: 16026750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task switching in mild cognitive impairment: switch and nonswitch costs.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Sanders C
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Jan; 15(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 19128533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Switching between univalent task-sets in schizophrenia: ERP evidence of an anticipatory task-set reconfiguration deficit.
    Karayanidis F; Nicholson R; Schall U; Meem L; Fulham R; Michie PT
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 117(10):2172-90. PubMed ID: 16926110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A more complete task-set reconfiguration in random than in predictable task switch.
    Tornay FJ; Milán EG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):785-803. PubMed ID: 11548035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm.
    Rubin O; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1477-91. PubMed ID: 16393058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No evidence for a late locus of task switch effects.
    Fiedler A; Schröter H; Ulrich R
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():74-80. PubMed ID: 19100725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.