BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026863)

  • 1. Assessment of IgM enzyme immunoassay and IgG avidity assay for distinguishing between primary and secondary immune response to rubella vaccine.
    Hamkar R; Jalilvand S; Mokhtari-Azad T; Nouri Jelyani K; Dahi-Far H; Soleimanjahi H; Nategh R
    J Virol Methods; 2005 Dec; 130(1-2):59-65. PubMed ID: 16026863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis of recent primary rubella virus infections: significance of glycoprotein-based IgM serology, IgG avidity and immunoblot analysis.
    Wandinger KP; Saschenbrecker S; Steinhagen K; Scheper T; Meyer W; Bartelt U; Enders G
    J Virol Methods; 2011 Jun; 174(1-2):85-93. PubMed ID: 21513745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing between primary infection and reinfection with rubella vaccine virus by IgG avidity assay in pregnant women.
    Hamkar R; Jalilvand S; Abdolbaghi MH; Jelyani KN; Esteghamati A; Hagh-goo A; Mohktari-Azad T; Nategh R
    East Mediterr Health J; 2009; 15(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 19469431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Usefulness of determining low-avidity IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of primary rubella infection in pregnant women].
    Lafarga B; Noguera FJ; Pérez MC; Copado R; García A; Soria E
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1998 Nov; 16(9):413-8. PubMed ID: 9887628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significance of avidity and immunoblot analysis for rubella IgM-positive serum samples in pregnant women.
    Hofmann J; Liebert UG
    J Virol Methods; 2005 Dec; 130(1-2):66-71. PubMed ID: 16024097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of the immunoglobulin G avidity and enzyme immunoassay IgG/IgM screening tests for differentiation of the clinical spectrum of toxoplasmosis.
    Tanyuksel M; Guney C; Araz E; Saracli MA; Doganci L
    J Microbiol; 2004 Sep; 42(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 15459650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of rubella IgM enzyme immunoassays.
    Tipples GA; Hamkar R; Mohktari-Azad T; Gray M; Ball J; Head C; Ratnam S
    J Clin Virol; 2004 Jul; 30(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 15135741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of serological methods for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies to rubella virus.
    Arista S; Pistoia D; Titone L; Ammatuna P
    Microbiologica; 1987 Apr; 10(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 3587064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the new ARCHITECT Rubella IgM assay.
    Eichler R; Prostko J; Fischer C; Hausmann M; Christ H
    J Clin Virol; 2007 Jul; 39(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 17543576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of commercial rubella immunoglobulin G avidity assays.
    Mubareka S; Richards H; Gray M; Tipples GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 45(1):231-3. PubMed ID: 17093027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Humoral immune response after primary rubella virus infection and after vaccination.
    Vauloup-Fellous C; Grangeot-Keros L
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2007 May; 14(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 17344342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Demonstration of Rubella-specific IgG and IgM antibody (sub) classes using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA)].
    Doerr HW; Fleischer G; Wiesmann M
    Immun Infekt; 1984 Feb; 12(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 6398271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical rubella reinfection during pregnancy in a previously vaccinated woman.
    Aboudy Y; Barnea B; Yosef L; Frank T; Mendelson E
    J Infect; 2000 Sep; 41(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 11023770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rubella immune status of pregnant and non-pregnant women in Istanbul, Turkey.
    Seker S; Abasiyanik MF; Salih BA
    Saudi Med J; 2004 May; 25(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 15138523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two commercial immunoassays for the detection of anti-rubella IgM and IgG in pediatric patients.
    Oliveira LC; Okay TS; Kawasato KH; Lima LP
    J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2007; 28(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 17613675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inadvertent rubella vaccination of pregnant women: evaluation of possible transplacental infection with rubella vaccine.
    Hamkar R; Jalilvand S; Abdolbaghi MH; Esteghamati AR; Hagh-Goo A; Jelyani KN; Mohktari-Azad T; Zahraei M; Nategh R
    Vaccine; 2006 Apr; 24(17):3558-63. PubMed ID: 16510217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of IgG antibodies against rubella virus using the "Rubella-IgG-EIA SSW" test kit].
    Meisegeier B; Engelmann A; Pustowoit B; Thiel B; Hehme N; Koppatz G; Richter B; Mohr J; Sandow D
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1990 May; 36(5):254-7. PubMed ID: 2368455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of avidity of specific IgG for verification of recent primary rubella.
    Hedman K; Rousseau SA
    J Med Virol; 1989 Apr; 27(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 2723615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Avidity of rubella IgG antibody in rubella virus infection].
    Hoshiba T; Nishimoto H; Asamoto A; Yabuki Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Dec; 45(12):1389-93. PubMed ID: 8270822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dried blood spots versus sera for detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG in samples collected during a rubella outbreak in Peru.
    Helfand RF; Cabezas C; Abernathy E; Castillo-Solorzano C; Ortiz AC; Sun H; Osores F; Oliveira L; Whittembury A; Charles M; Andrus J; Icenogle J
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):1522-5. PubMed ID: 17881506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.