286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026873)
1. Automated selection of beam orientations and segmented intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of oesophagus tumors.
Woudstra E; Heijmen BJ; Storchi PR
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Dec; 77(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 16026873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of an algorithm for automated sequential beam orientation selection (Cycle) with simulated annealing.
Woudstra E; Heijmen BJ; Storchi PR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):2003-18. PubMed ID: 18364556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis.
de Pooter JA; Méndez Romero A; Wunderink W; Storchi PR; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 18585809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost treatment on the lung-dose distributions for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Choi Y; Kim JK; Lee HS; Hur WJ; Chai GY; Kang KM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 15927412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Schwarz M; Alber M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):561-70. PubMed ID: 15890601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy to improve lung sparing in treatment planning for distal esophageal cancer.
Chandra A; Guerrero TM; Liu HH; Tucker SL; Liao Z; Wang X; Murshed H; Bonnen MD; Garg AK; Stevens CW; Chang JY; Jeter MD; Mohan R; Cox JD; Komaki R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Dec; 77(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 16298001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is multibeam IMRT better than standard treatment for patients with left-sided breast cancer?
Beckham WA; Popescu CC; Patenaude VV; Wai ES; Olivotto IA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(3):918-24. PubMed ID: 17889273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Liu HH; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Liao Z; Stevens CW; Guerrero TM; Komaki R; Cox JD; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1268-79. PubMed ID: 15001272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT.
Rossi L; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJ; Voet PW; Lanconelli N; Aluwini S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(17):5441-58. PubMed ID: 22864234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?
Girinsky T; Pichenot C; Beaudre A; Ghalibafian M; Lefkopoulos D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 16169675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid IMRT for treatment of cancers of the lung and esophagus.
Mayo CS; Urie MM; Fitzgerald TJ; Ding L; Lo YC; Bogdanov M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1408-18. PubMed ID: 18262730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverse-planned, dynamic, multi-beam, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a promising technique when target volume is the left breast and internal mammary lymph nodes.
Popescu CC; Olivotto I; Patenaude V; Wai E; Beckham WA
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 17134668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.
Verbakel WF; Cuijpers JP; Hoffmans D; Bieker M; Slotman BJ; Senan S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 May; 74(1):252-9. PubMed ID: 19362244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]