242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16026911)
1. Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration.
Kessler P; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 43(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 16026911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs.
Wiltfang J; Kessler P; Merten HA; Neukam FW
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 39(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11178848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
Kessler PA; Merten HA; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 11786809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transport distraction: mandibular reconstruction.
Stucki-McCormick SU; Fox R; Mizrahi R
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 11905332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.
Kessler P; Wiltfang J; Neukam FW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 28(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10851667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of osteoinduction on bone regeneration in distraction: results of a pilot study.
Kroczek A; Park J; Birkholz T; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J; Kessler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):334-44. PubMed ID: 19910206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiogenesis is enhanced by continuous traction in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
Zheng LW; Ma L; Cheung LK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19428266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical and orthodontic considerations for distraction osteogenesis with ROD appliances.
Dessner S; Razdolsky Y; el-Bialy T
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):111-39. PubMed ID: 11905335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis: maxillary and mandibular lengthening.
Guerrero CA; Bell WH; Meza LS
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):111-51. PubMed ID: 11905328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Positional changes and stability of bone segments during simultaneous bilateral mandibular lengthening and widening by distraction.
Gonzalez M; Bell WH; Guerrero CA; Buschang PH; Samchukov ML
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 39(3):169-78. PubMed ID: 11384111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Segmental mandibular reconstruction by elasticity distraction osteogenesis associated with guided bone regeneration].
Zhou HZ; Hu M; Liu HC; Yao J; Ma L
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 16329831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandible reconstruction using a 2-phase transport disc distraction osteogenesis: a case report.
Whitesides LM; Wunderle RC; Guerrero C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 15690299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of gene expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 between continuous and intermittent distraction osteogenesis: a quantitative study on rabbits.
Liu XL; Cheung LK; Zhang HX; Li JY; Ma L; Zheng LW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):e185-8. PubMed ID: 22093241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distraction osteogenesis for mandibular widening.
Epker BN
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11905330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New internal transport distraction device for reconstructing segmental defects of the mandible.
Hibi H; Ueda M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 16236405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Distraction osteogenesis in the head and neck region].
Koudstaal MJ; Rupreht J; van der Wal KG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Jul; 150(28):1557-61. PubMed ID: 16886691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of cortical bone perforation on periosteal distraction: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible.
Oda T; Kinoshita K; Ueda M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 67(7):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19531421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs.
Shang H; Lin X; Du J; He L; Liu Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21470726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model.
Candırlı C; Dolanmaz D; Etöz OA; Avunduk MC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
