These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Aras A; Ada E; Saracoğlu H; Gezer NS; Aras I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis. Cevidanes LH; Franco AA; Scanavini MA; Vigorito JW; Enlow DH; Proffit WR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 12695764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion. Ghislanzoni LT; Baccetti T; Toll D; Defraia E; McNamara JA; Franchi L Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 22423185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Topography and morphology of the mandibular condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment --a magnetic resonance imaging study. Kinzinger G; Kober C; Diedrich P J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Mar; 68(2):124-47. PubMed ID: 17372710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response. Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular fossa morphology during therapy with a fixed functional orthodontic appliance : A magnetic resonance imaging study. Kinzinger GSM; Hourfar J; Kober C; Lisson JA J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Mar; 79(2):116-132. PubMed ID: 29464288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of functional jaw orthopedics in subjects with unfavorable Class II skeletal patterns. Baccetti T; McNamara JA Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20974448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D mandibular positioning after rapid maxillary expansion in Class II malocclusion. Baratieri C; Alves M; Sant'anna EF; Nojima Mda C; Nojima LI Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):428-34. PubMed ID: 22011901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance. Fan Y; Schneider P; Matthews H; Roberts WE; Xu T; Wei R; Claes P; Clement J; Kilpatrick N; Penington A BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 32299402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance]. Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Singh GD; Clark WJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods. Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]