These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028239)

  • 1. Assessment of magnetic field (4.7 T) induced forces on prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings.
    Edwards MB; Ordidge RJ; Hand JW; Taylor KM; Young IR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Aug; 22(2):311-7. PubMed ID: 16028239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Translational and rotational forces on heart valve prostheses subjected ex vivo to a 4.7-T MR system.
    Edwards MB; Ordidge RJ; Thomas DL; Hand JW; Taylor KM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):653-9. PubMed ID: 12451578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards.
    Pruefer D; Kalden P; Schreiber W; Dahm M; Buerke M; Thelen M; Oelert H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 11380110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 12451586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [In vitro investigation of biological and technical prosthetic heart valves using MRI: evaluation of possible deflection and heating of the implants].
    Kalden P; Prüfer D; Schreiber W; Kreitner KF; Oelert H; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2000 Feb; 172(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 10723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2001; 3(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 11777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Orthodontic brackets in high field MR imaging: experimental evaluation of magnetic field interactions at 3.0 Tesla].
    Kemper J; Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1691-8. PubMed ID: 16333793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for measuring the torque on implantable cardiovascular devices in MR static fields.
    D'Avenio G; Canese R; Podo F; Grigioni M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1368-74. PubMed ID: 17969137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustable cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves in 3.0-Tesla MRI: a phantom study using explanted devices.
    Akbar M; Aschoff A; Georgi JC; Nennig E; Heiland S; Abel R; Stippich C
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 20563954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic field interactions of orthodontic wires during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 Tesla.
    Klocke A; Kemper J; Schulze D; Adam G; Kahl-Nieke B
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 16044226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static analysis of annuloplasty rings sutured on an annulus model of the mitral valve: comparison between the Duran ring and the Carpentier Classic ring.
    Arita M; Kasegawa H; Umezu M
    J Artif Organs; 2004; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 15083342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of the magnetic field in magnetic resonance imaging on 15 tested cardiac valve prostheses].
    Hassler M; Le Bas JF; Wolf JE; Contamin C; Waksmann B; Coulomb M
    J Radiol; 1986 Oct; 67(10):661-6. PubMed ID: 3795175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innovative, replaceable heart valve: concept, in vitro study, and acute in vivo study.
    Fukamachi K; Ootaki Y; Ootaki C; Akiyama M; Kamohara K; Cingoz F; Chen JF; Horvath DJ; Massiello AL; Dessoffy R
    Artif Organs; 2008 Mar; 32(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 18201287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the translational and rotational forces acting on a highly ferromagnetic orthopedic spinal implant in magnetic resonance imaging.
    McComb C; Allan D; Condon B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 19161201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What force can the myocardium generate on a prosthetic mitral valve ring? An animal experimental study.
    Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Kim WY; Hansen OK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 8087273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety evaluation of titanium middle ear prostheses at 3.0 tesla.
    Martin AD; Driscoll CL; Wood CP; Felmlee JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 15806041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves.
    Soulen RL; Budinger TF; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):705-7. PubMed ID: 3969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.