These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028538)
1. The cloning debate in the United Kingdom: the academy meets the public. Herissone-Kelly P Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 16028538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors. Weasel LH; Jensen E New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive cloning: can cloning harm the clone? Pattinson SD Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 14986663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human embryonic cloning. Bruce D Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16639815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Public policy crafted in response to public ignorance is bad public policy. Silver L Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1037-47. PubMed ID: 15508214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clones, ethics and infertility or sex, sheep and statutes. Deech RL Quinnipiac Health Law J; 1999; 2(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 15712425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cloning: the human as created co-creator? Hansen B; Schotsmans P Ethical Perspect; 2001; 8(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 15991424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Galileo and the embryos: religion and science in parliamentary debate over research on human embryos. Mulkay M Soc Stud Sci; 1995 Aug; 25(3):499-532. PubMed ID: 11645893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stem cells and the culture wars. Diamond EF Linacre Q; 2005 Aug; 72(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 16317847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cloning name games: therapeutic cloning is still cloning. O'Mathuna DP Todays Christ Dr; 2002; 33(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 12599383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A scientist's view on therapeutic cloning. Thuning-Roberson C Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2002; 2(3):368-70. PubMed ID: 12854593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Only God can do that? Cloning and genetic engineering test the moral limits of science. Shermer M Skeptic; 1999; 7(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 17333596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The debate about Dolly. Klotzko AJ Bioethics; 1997 Oct; 11(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 11655121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.K. bioethics. Divided committee urges less restriction on embryo research. Inman M Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):30. PubMed ID: 15802569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomy of a media event: how arguments clashed in the 2001 human cloning debate. Nerlich B; Clarke DD New Genet Soc; 2003 Apr; 22(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 15282898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power without responsibility: media portrayals of Dolly and science. Wilkie T; Graham E Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 9532390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Embryonic stem cell research in Iran: status and ethics. Saniei M; De Vries R Indian J Med Ethics; 2008; 5(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 18988380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Christian Action Research and Education (CARE): declaration on human genetics and other new technologies in medicine. Christian Action Research and Education Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 14964204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]