These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028580)

  • 1. False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity.
    Fazendeiro T; Winkielman P; Luo C; Lorah C
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 16028580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluency effects in recognition memory: are perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency interchangeable?
    Lanska M; Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24001021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the mental representation underlying familiarity assessment.
    Dopkins S; Sargent J; Ngo CT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 23046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False recognition without intentional learning.
    Dodd MD; MacLeod CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 15116999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usage of semantic representations in recognition memory.
    Nishiyama R; Hirano T; Ukita J
    Memory; 2017 Nov; 25(10):1412-1424. PubMed ID: 28398120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related increases in false recognition: the role of perceptual and conceptual similarity.
    Pidgeon LM; Morcom AM
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2014; 6():283. PubMed ID: 25368576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False recognition following study of semantically related lists presented in jumbled word form.
    Halcomb SH; Taylor JP; DeSouza KD; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 18432488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural correlates of correctly rejecting lures during memory retrieval: the role of item relatedness.
    Bowman CR; Dennis NA
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1963-75. PubMed ID: 25862563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two mechanisms of constructive recollection: Perceptual recombination and conceptual fluency.
    Doss MK; Bluestone MR; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1747-1758. PubMed ID: 27088497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonetic-semantic mediated false recognition: does activation fail to spread?
    Wallace WP; Salapska-Gelleri J; Belz CL; Owen MA
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(4):585-617. PubMed ID: 17286090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normative data for semantically associated Spanish word lists that create false memories.
    Anastasi JS; De Leon A; Rhodes MG
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 Nov; 37(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 16629295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory.
    Diana RA; Peterson MJ; Reder LM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 15117001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?
    Pesta BJ; Murphy MD; Sanders RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 11294435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.
    Wong M; Rotello CM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19966238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation in individuals' semantic networks for common knowledge is associated with false memory.
    Stevens-Adams SM; Goldsmith TE; Butler KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1035-43. PubMed ID: 22554183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why seemingly more difficult test conditions produce more accurate recognition of semantic prototype words: A recognition memory paradox?
    Jou J; Escamilla EE; Torres AU; Ortiz A; Perez M; Zuniga R
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Aug; 63():239-253. PubMed ID: 30008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateralized processing of false memories and pseudoneglect in aging.
    Schmitz R; Dehon H; Peigneux P
    Cortex; 2013 May; 49(5):1314-24. PubMed ID: 22818903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Format change and semantic relatedness effects on the ERP correlates of recognition: old pairs, new pairs, different stories.
    Guillaume F; Baier S; Bourgeois M; Tinard S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1007-1019. PubMed ID: 28032139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.
    Coane JH; McBride DM; Termonen ML; Cutting JC
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 26250805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.