153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028582)
1. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
McDaniel MA; Einstein GO; DeLosh EL; May CP; Brady P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):422-435. PubMed ID: 7738508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.
Mulligan NW; Peterson D
Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1371-82. PubMed ID: 19015497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.
Einstein GO; McDaniel MA; Lackey S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 2522138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery.
Riefer DM; Rouder JN
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 1435263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The bizarreness effect: dissociation between item and source memory.
Macklin CB; McDaniel MA
Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):682-9. PubMed ID: 16191818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: elaboration at encoding.
Robinson-Riegler B; McDaniel MA
Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):702-12. PubMed ID: 7808279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
Gounden Y; Nicolas S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humour mediates the facilitative effect of bizarreness in delayed recall.
Worthen JB; Deschamps JD
Br J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 99(Pt 4):461-71. PubMed ID: 18433519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness andĀ bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. List length and the bizarreness effect: support for a hybrid explanation.
Worthen JB; Marshall PH; Cox KB
Psychol Res; 1998; 61(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 9689909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bizarre imagery in paired-associate learning: an effective mnemonic aid with mixed context, delayed testing, and self-paced conditions.
Iaccino JF; Sowa SJ
Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 2928063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation.
Jang Y; Huber DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27. PubMed ID: 18194058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between personality variables and bizarreness effects in free recall.
Moss BJ; Worthen JB; Haydel LA; Mahon BD; Savoy SC
Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 18510131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variations in constrained retrieval.
Alban MW; Kelley CM
Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):681-92. PubMed ID: 22297425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]