BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028582)

  • 1. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
    McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
    McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.
    Geraci L; McDaniel MA; Miller TM; Hughes ML
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1228-37. PubMed ID: 23737359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex.
    McDaniel MA; Einstein GO; DeLosh EL; May CP; Brady P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):422-435. PubMed ID: 7738508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect.
    Black SR; McCown S; Lookadoo RL; Leonard RC; Kelley M; DeCoster J; Wayde E; Spence SA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):566-91. PubMed ID: 22248375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1371-82. PubMed ID: 19015497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.
    Einstein GO; McDaniel MA; Lackey S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 2522138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery.
    Riefer DM; Rouder JN
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 1435263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bizarreness effect: dissociation between item and source memory.
    Macklin CB; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 2005 Oct; 13(7):682-9. PubMed ID: 16191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
    Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further constraints on the bizarreness effect: elaboration at encoding.
    Robinson-Riegler B; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Nov; 22(6):702-12. PubMed ID: 7808279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ageing and secondary-distinctiveness-based effects: the orthographic distinctiveness effect is more robust than the bizarreness effect.
    Gounden Y; Nicolas S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1820-32. PubMed ID: 22524538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Humour mediates the facilitative effect of bizarreness in delayed recall.
    Worthen JB; Deschamps JD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 99(Pt 4):461-71. PubMed ID: 18433519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary distinctiveness effects: Orthographic distinctiveness andĀ bizarreness effects make independent contributions to memory performance.
    Gounden Y; Cerroti F; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 27859302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. List length and the bizarreness effect: support for a hybrid explanation.
    Worthen JB; Marshall PH; Cox KB
    Psychol Res; 1998; 61(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 9689909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bizarre imagery in paired-associate learning: an effective mnemonic aid with mixed context, delayed testing, and self-paced conditions.
    Iaccino JF; Sowa SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Feb; 68(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 2928063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation.
    Jang Y; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27. PubMed ID: 18194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between personality variables and bizarreness effects in free recall.
    Moss BJ; Worthen JB; Haydel LA; Mahon BD; Savoy SC
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 18510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variations in constrained retrieval.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):681-92. PubMed ID: 22297425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.