BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16028582)

  • 21. Enactment and retrieval.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 20173195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The functional locus of intrusions: encoding or retrieval?
    Dalla Barba G; Mantovan MC; Traykov L; Rieu D; Laurent A; Ermani M; Devouche E
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distinctiveness effects in recall: differential processing or privileged retrieval?
    Waddill PJ; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jan; 26(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 9519701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The bizarreness effect and individual differences in imaging ability.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):533-40. PubMed ID: 12027349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. State-dependent effects of alcohol on explicit memory: the role of semantic associations.
    Weissenborn R; Duka T
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Mar; 149(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 10789889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events.
    Schmidt SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jul; 11(3):565-78. PubMed ID: 3160816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.
    McDaniel MA; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 18488637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects.
    Whiffen JW; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 28080119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retrieval-induced forgetting: testing the competition assumption of inhibition theory.
    Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 22506876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
    Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Memory retrieval as a self-propagating process.
    Bäuml KH; Schlichting A
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 24727424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Similarity information versus relational information: differences in the time course of retrieval.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    Cogn Psychol; 1989 Apr; 21(2):139-55. PubMed ID: 2706926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Schacter DL; Cendan DL; Dodson CS; Clifford ER
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):827-33. PubMed ID: 11848606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing.
    Mulligan NW; Lozito JP
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of label distinctiveness and label testing on recognition of complex pictures.
    Bartlett JC; Till RE; Fields WC
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):505-27. PubMed ID: 7212128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The bizarreness effect and visual imagery: No impact of concurrent visuo-spatial distractor tasks indicates little role for visual imagery.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 34351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrieval processes in continuous recognition.
    Hockley WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1982 Nov; 8(6):497-512. PubMed ID: 6218219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.