BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16029841)

  • 1. The role of body weight in oral contraceptive failure: results from the 1995 national survey of family growth.
    Brunner LR; Hogue CJ
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 15(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 16029841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obesity and oral contraceptive failure: findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Brunner Huber LR; Toth JL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 166(11):1306-11. PubMed ID: 17785712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Body mass index and risk for oral contraceptive failure: a case-cohort study in South Carolina.
    Brunner Huber LR; Hogue CJ; Stein AD; Drews C; Zieman M
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 16(8):637-43. PubMed ID: 16516489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral contraceptive effectiveness according to body mass index, weight, age, and other factors.
    Dinger JC; Cronin M; Möhner S; Schellschmidt I; Minh TD; Westhoff C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 201(3):263.e1-9. PubMed ID: 19481720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between efficacy and body weight or body mass index for two low-dose oral contraceptives.
    Burkman RT; Fisher AC; Wan GJ; Barnowski CE; LaGuardia KD
    Contraception; 2009 Jun; 79(6):424-7. PubMed ID: 19442776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Body mass index, weight, and oral contraceptive failure risk.
    Holt VL; Scholes D; Wicklund KG; Cushing-Haugen KL; Daling JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 15625141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between body mass index and unintended pregnancy: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Kaneshiro B; Edelman A; Carlson N; Nichols M; Jensen J
    Contraception; 2008 Apr; 77(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 18342645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraceptive use and contraception type in women by body mass index category.
    Schraudenbach A; McFall S
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):381-9. PubMed ID: 19879452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anthropometry and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Greer JB; Modugno F; Ness RB; Allen GO
    Cancer; 2006 May; 106(10):2247-57. PubMed ID: 16596653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weight history and risk of endometrial cancer among Chinese women.
    Xu WH; Xiang YB; Zheng W; Zhang X; Ruan ZX; Cheng JR; Gao YT; Shu XO
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 35(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 16258056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contraception and pregnancy then and now: examining the experiences of a cohort of mid-age Australian women.
    Read C; Bateson D; Weisberg E; Estoesta J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug; 49(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 19694702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contraceptive considerations in obese women: release date 1 September 2009, SFP Guideline 20091.
    ; Higginbotham S
    Contraception; 2009 Dec; 80(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 19913155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnancy weight gain and premenopausal breast cancer risk.
    Hilakivi-Clarke L; Luoto R; Huttunen T; Koskenvuo M
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Nov; 50(11):811-6. PubMed ID: 16419626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contraindications to oral contraceptive use among women in the United States, 1999-2001.
    Shortridge E; Miller K
    Contraception; 2007 May; 75(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 17434016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral contraceptive use and smoking habits in young Israeli women: a cross-sectional study.
    Zimlichman E; Mandel D; Mimouni FB; Wartenfeld R; Huerta M; Grotto I; Kreiss Y
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Sep; 6(9):546-9. PubMed ID: 15373313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beverage intake among preschool children and its effect on weight status.
    O'Connor TM; Yang SJ; Nicklas TA
    Pediatrics; 2006 Oct; 118(4):e1010-8. PubMed ID: 17015497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraceptive use and pregnancy outcome in three generations of Swedish female teenagers from the same urban population.
    Lindh I; Blohm F; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I
    Contraception; 2009 Aug; 80(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 19631792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weight gain in obese and nonobese adolescent girls initiating depot medroxyprogesterone, oral contraceptive pills, or no hormonal contraceptive method.
    Bonny AE; Ziegler J; Harvey R; Debanne SM; Secic M; Cromer BA
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2006 Jan; 160(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16389209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parity, other reproductive factors, and risk of pancreatic cancer mortality in a large cohort of U.S. women (United States).
    Teras LR; Patel AV; Rodriguez C; Thun MJ; Calle EE
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Nov; 16(9):1035-40. PubMed ID: 16184468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer among women with a family history of breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.
    Silvera SA; Miller AB; Rohan TE
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Nov; 16(9):1059-63. PubMed ID: 16184471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.