These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16030341)

  • 1. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
    Haack S
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.
    Jasanoff S
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 16030338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
    Cecil JS
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.
    Wagner W
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.
    Krimsky S
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S129-36. PubMed ID: 16030328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Daubert's menace.
    Gori GB
    Am J Public Health; 2006 Feb; 96(2):206; discussion 206-7. PubMed ID: 16380556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions.
    Hoppin PJ; Clapp R
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 16030343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
    Lakoff GP
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.
    Neufeld PJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
    J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulatory parallels to Daubert: stakeholder influence, "sound science," and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards.
    Neff RA; Goldman LR
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S81-91. PubMed ID: 16030344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epistemology in the courtroom: a little "knowledge" is a dangerous thing.
    Ozonoff D
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S13-5. PubMed ID: 16030329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
    Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.