314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16030341)
1. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
Haack S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.
Jasanoff S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 16030338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
Melnick RL
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
Cecil JS
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.
Wagner W
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
Cranor C
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.
Krimsky S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S129-36. PubMed ID: 16030328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Daubert's menace.
Gori GB
Am J Public Health; 2006 Feb; 96(2):206; discussion 206-7. PubMed ID: 16380556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
Davies J
Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions.
Hoppin PJ; Clapp R
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 16030343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
Lakoff GP
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.
Neufeld PJ
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulatory parallels to Daubert: stakeholder influence, "sound science," and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards.
Neff RA; Goldman LR
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S81-91. PubMed ID: 16030344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
Grivas CR; Komar DA
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epistemology in the courtroom: a little "knowledge" is a dangerous thing.
Ozonoff D
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S13-5. PubMed ID: 16030329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
Faigman DL; Monahan J
Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
