338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16030386)
1. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography commissioning programmes: how to obtain a reliable MTF with an automatic approach?
Miéville F; Beaumont S; Torfeh T; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):443-8. PubMed ID: 20167797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration.
van de Kraats EB; Penney GP; Tomazevic D; van Walsum T; Niessen WJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1177-89. PubMed ID: 16156355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
Elbakri IA; Tesic MM; Xiong Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the modulation transfer function of digitally reconstructed radiographs in radiotherapy treatment planning using a point phantom.
Kirwin SL; Langmack KA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):N251-5. PubMed ID: 16204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors.
Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ
Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harmonisation of the appearance of digital radiographs from different vendors by means of common external image processing.
Larsson L; Båth M; Engman EL; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):92-7. PubMed ID: 20185456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Månsson LG
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3172-82. PubMed ID: 14713084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel segmentation method using multiresolution analysis with 3D visualization for X-ray coronary angiogram images.
Nirmaladevi S; Lavanya P; Kumaravel N
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 18432472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
