These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16030419)
21. Evaluating quality of census tract data in the NPCR dataset. Singh S; Ajani UA; Wilson RJ; Thomas CC J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 20795557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A cancer program's seal of approval. Koering SM J AHIMA; 2002 Jan; 73(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 12469661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Bray F; Parkin DM Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A generic solution for web-based management of pseudonymized data. Lautenschläger R; Kohlmayer F; Prasser F; Kuhn KA BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Nov; 15():100. PubMed ID: 26621059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [External evaluation of population-based cancer registries: the REDEPICAN Guide for Latin America]. Navarro C; Molina JA; Barrios E; Izarzugaza I; Loria D; Cueva P; Sánchez MJ; Chirlaque MD; Fernández L Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2013 Nov; 34(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 24553761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A registry of registries? The US backs the idea for patients. Heger M Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 21217651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Data quality at population-based cancer registries in Colombia. Cendales R; Pardo C; Uribe C; López G; Yepez MC; Bravo LE Biomedica; 2012; 32(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 23715229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical registry governance and patient privacy. Williamson OD; Cameron PA; McNeil JJ Med J Aust; 2004 Aug; 181(3):125-6. PubMed ID: 15287827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The reliability of cancer registry records. Gulliford M Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 10158590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Comparability and quality of data. Parkin DM; Muir CS IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (120):45-173. PubMed ID: 1284606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Danish Cancer Registry. Gjerstorff ML Scand J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 39(7 Suppl):42-5. PubMed ID: 21775350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The hospital only project. Holowaty EJ; Dale D Health Rep; 1993; 5(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 8334244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A note on confidentiality of death notification forms. Bah S S Afr Med J; 2003 Apr; 93(4):238. PubMed ID: 12806701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Confidentiality in the cancer registry. Coleman MP; Muir CS; Ménégoz F Br J Cancer; 1992 Dec; 66(6):1138-49. PubMed ID: 1457355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Consent to cancer registration--an unnecessary burden. Paterson IC BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7294):1130. PubMed ID: 11337454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. European biobanks forge cross-border ties. Keogh B J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Oct; 103(19):1429-31. PubMed ID: 21934073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of cameras is the wrong way to expose poor practice. Tallo D Nurs Stand; 2015 Jul; 29(44):33. PubMed ID: 26136029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]