These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16032811)

  • 1. The "therapeutic orgy" and the "right to rot" collide: the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs under state law.
    Blackburn CE
    Houst Law Rev; 1990 May; 27(3):447-513. PubMed ID: 16032811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
    Brooks WM
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presumed dangerous: California's selective policy of forcibly medicating state prisoners with antipsychotic drugs.
    Gross DE
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 35():483-517. PubMed ID: 17066562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment revisited.
    Slovenko R
    J Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 11659854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill: autonomy is asking the wrong question.
    Klein DW
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Aug; (304):9-40. PubMed ID: 15503519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill: autonomy is asking the wrong question.
    Klein DW
    Vt Law Rev; 2003; 72(3):649-80. PubMed ID: 15568282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM
    Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Update on the right to refuse antipsychotic medication.
    Williams KG
    DICP; 1991; 25(7-8):849-52. PubMed ID: 11659419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
    Goff ML
    Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
    Dresser RS
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment.
    Levick M; Wapner A
    Temple Law Q; 1975; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Killings loom over debate on treating mentally ill; New Mexico considers commitment law.
    Archibold RC
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A16. PubMed ID: 16514737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.