These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16032817)
1. Reproductive technologies and United States law. Vetri D Int Comp Law Q; 1988 Jul; 37():505-34. PubMed ID: 16032817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to know one's genetic origin: can, should, or must a state that extends this right to adoptees extend an analogous right to children conceived with donor gametes? Chestney ES Tex Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 80(2):365-91. PubMed ID: 12680363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies. Elster NR Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Present state of reproductive medicine in Japan - ethical issues with a focus on those seen in court cases. Mayeda M BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 7():E3. PubMed ID: 16597339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Succession problems arising from artificial insemination, surrogate motherhood and test tube babies: a proposed solution. Smith GD Juv Fam Court J; 1989; 40(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11650260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical and legal aspects of in-vitro fertilization and artificial insemination by donor. Andrews LB Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Aug; 14(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 3617272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger? Daar JF Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies. Andrews LB ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts. Havins WE; Dalessio JJ McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Matters of life and death: inheritance consequences of reproductive technologies. Shapo HS Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1091-220. PubMed ID: 11858286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In-vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer (ET) and assisted reproduction in the State of Israel. Schenker JG Hum Reprod; 1987 Nov; 2(8):755-8. PubMed ID: 11644108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial insemination: its effect on paternity and inheritance rights. Gordon-Ceresky DL Conn Probate Law J; 1995; 9(2):245-71. PubMed ID: 16296567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted conception and the law in the United Kingdom. Braude P; Muhammed S BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7421):978-81. PubMed ID: 14576252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New methods of conception and their legal status. Pilpel HF N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1985; 3():13-33. PubMed ID: 16100809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]