These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16032998)
1. [Feasibility of MRI imaging in patients with breast cancer]. Mooyaart EA; Veltman J; Boetes C; Blickman JG Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jul; 149(27):1521-7. PubMed ID: 16032998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period]. Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of breast MRI in clinical practice. Brennan M; Spillane A; Houssami N Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 38(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 19575070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI in breast cancer management: potential for benefit and harm. Jatoi I Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2005; 50(6):281-4. PubMed ID: 16526420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery. Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG; Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers: a prospective phase II study. Bollet MA; Thibault F; Bouillon K; Meunier M; Sigal-Zafrani B; Savignoni A; Diéras V; Nos C; Salmon R; Fourquet A; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17449193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study. Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of MRI in screening, diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Swayampakula AK; Dillis C; Abraham J Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 May; 8(5):811-7. PubMed ID: 18471052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Wasif N; Garreau J; Terando A; Kirsch D; Mund DF; Giuliano AE Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 19886147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women. Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study. Peters G; Anderson J; Longman G; Thomson J; Taylor D; Bennett M; Wylie E; Goldblatt J; Chan A; Saunders C J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18373823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening. Feig S Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Counterview: Pre-operative breast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is not recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Solin LJ Breast; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 20159457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Munot K; Dall B; Achuthan R; Parkin G; Lane S; Horgan K Br J Surg; 2002 Oct; 89(10):1296-301. PubMed ID: 12296901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer. D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]