250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16033587)
1. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability.
Rosa JM; Camacho S; García-Dorado A
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 16033587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster.
Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):762-7. PubMed ID: 16739457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Demontis D; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Mikkelsen K; Axelsson T; Kristensen TN
Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QTL mapping of inbreeding-related cold sensitivity and conditional lethality in Drosophila melanogaster.
Vermeulen CJ; Bijlsma R; Loeschcke V
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1236-44. PubMed ID: 18631212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
García-Dorado A; Monedero JL; López-Fanjul C
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):255-65. PubMed ID: 9720284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synergistic epistasis and alternative hypotheses.
Trouve S; Ding A; Goudet J
J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1400-1; discussion 1402-4. PubMed ID: 15525424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated inbreeding depression suggests synergistic epistasis for deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
Domínguez-García S; García C; Quesada H; Caballero A
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Dec; 123(6):709-722. PubMed ID: 31477803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Connallon T; Knowles LL
Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inbreeding depression and multiple regions showing heterozygote advantage in Drosophila melanogaster exposed to stress.
Ferreira AG; Amos W
Mol Ecol; 2006 Nov; 15(13):3885-93. PubMed ID: 17054490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila- effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components.
Kristensen TN; Sørensen AC; Sorensen D; Pedersen KS; Sørensen JG; Loeschcke V
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 16033547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster- Hsp70 expression and fitness.
Pedersen KS; Kristensen TN; Loeschcke V
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):756-62. PubMed ID: 16033546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of synergistic epistasis on the inbreeding load.
Charlesworth B
Genet Res; 1998 Feb; 71(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 9674385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
Otto SP; Feldman MW
Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The decline in fitness with inbreeding: evidence for negative dominance-by-dominance epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.
Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 26709722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Population genetics processes in animal generations with brother X sister inbreeding and the absence of selection].
Petrenko IP
Tsitol Genet; 1994; 28(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7941022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging.
Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16780526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
