These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1603378)

  • 1. The Department of Defense Civilian External Peer Review Program: an interim report.
    Buck AS; Martin ED; Mazzuchi JF; Merry M; Mendez E
    Mil Med; 1992 Jan; 157(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1603378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A first report of the Department of Defense external civilian peer review of medical care.
    Mayer W; Clinton JJ; Newhall D
    JAMA; 1988 Nov; 260(18):2690-3. PubMed ID: 3184336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Civilian external peer review: lessons learned.
    Jeffer EK; Guida RA; Jantzen E
    J Qual Assur; 1989 Dec-1990 Jan; 11(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 10296575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can an external quality review system avoid the inspection model?
    Merry MD
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 Oct; 17(10):315-9. PubMed ID: 1745530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review in a quality assurance program: a physician acceptance model for a teaching hospital service.
    Embry R; Hansen M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Apr; 13(4):43, 48. PubMed ID: 10134643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality 'norms' developed by DoD.
    Tomich N
    US Med; 1983 Oct; 19(19):1, 6. PubMed ID: 10317374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Military hospitals see new chance in quality reviews.
    Burda D
    Hospitals; 1986 Apr; 60(7):94. PubMed ID: 3957301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective peer review at Brooke Army Medical Center.
    Zaloznik AJ; Montgomery RM
    Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1992; 12(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10116283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Historical evolution of medical quality assurance in the Department of Defense.
    Granger E; Boyer J; Weiss R; Linton A; Williams TV
    Mil Med; 2010 Aug; 175(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 20731262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A guide to the external review of an academic radiology department.
    Collins J; Amis ES; Beauchamp NJ; Norbash AM; Meltzer CC;
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 24507427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does money really matter? The effects of fiscal margin on quality of care in military treatment facilities.
    Beauvais B; Wells R; Vasey J; DelliFraine JL
    Hosp Top; 2007; 85(3):2-15. PubMed ID: 17711809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Collaborative To Evaluate And Improve The Quality Of Surgical Care Delivered By The Military Health System.
    Learn PA; Mullen MJ; Saldinger PF; Kreishman P; Cordts PR; Ko CY; Knudson MM; Elster EA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2019 Aug; 38(8):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 31381406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance: time for a change of focus.
    Butler ML
    Mil Med; 1990 Jun; 155(6):289-90. PubMed ID: 2122311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization review expanded into quality assurance program.
    Kearns PM
    Hospitals; 1980 Sep; 54(17):62-3. PubMed ID: 7399451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using quality service analysts to streamline record reviews.
    Fogg JT; Ferguson EW
    J Healthc Qual; 1994; 16(6):25-7, 34. PubMed ID: 10137422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of a peer review process to improve documentation consistency of care process indicators in the EMR in a primary care setting.
    Milchak JL; Shanahan RL; Kerzee JA
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2012; 18(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 22235954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MMA peer review program to monitor quality of care.
    Hanson PC
    Minn Med; 1993 Apr; 76(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 8515734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assessment in primary military clinics of the Israel Defense Forces Northern Command.
    Riskin A; Reis S; Tamir A; Shemer J
    Mil Med; 2006 May; 171(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 16761882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. Army-Baylor University Health Care Administration Program: evidenced-based outcomes in the military health system.
    Mangelsdorff AD; Rogers J; Finstuen K; Pryor R
    J Health Adm Educ; 2004; 21(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 15129901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.