431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16034566)
1. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
Eimer M; van Velzen J
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Eimer M; Cockburn D; Smedley B; Driver J
Exp Brain Res; 2001 Aug; 139(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 11534863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
Eimer M; Driver J
Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials.
Eimer M; Van Velzen J
Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 12212636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shifts of attention in light and in darkness: an ERP study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal links in spatial attention.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Forster B; Driver J
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 15(3):308-23. PubMed ID: 12527104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.
Kennett S; Eimer M; Spence C; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 May; 13(4):462-78. PubMed ID: 11388920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal dynamics of lateralized ERP components elicited during endogenous attentional shifts to relevant tactile events.
van Velzen J; Forster B; Eimer M
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 12462516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Eimer M
Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(12):1292-303. PubMed ID: 11566312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
Gherri E; Forster B
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
Sambo CF; Forster B
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial attention affects the processing of tactile and visual stimuli presented at the tip of a tool: an event-related potential study.
Yue Z; Bischof GN; Zhou X; Spence C; Röder B
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 193(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 18936924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-hemifield posture changes affect tactile-visual exogenous spatial cueing without spatial precision, especially in the dark.
Kennett S; Driver J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 24470256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.
Macaluso E; Eimer M; Frith CD; Driver J
Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 12592504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET.
Macaluso E; Frith C; Driver J
J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):3062-75. PubMed ID: 10805701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency tagging of steady-state evoked potentials to explore the crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
Colon E; Legrain V; Huang G; Mouraux A
Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 26329531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
