30 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1603476)
1. Barriers to HIV Testing in Black Immigrants to the U.S.
Ojikutu B; Nnaji C; Sithole-Berk J; Bogart LM; Gona P
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2014 Aug; 25(3):1052-66. PubMed ID: 25130224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening intervention for prison inmates.
Elwood Martin R; Hislop TG; Grams GD; Calam B; Jones E; Moravan V
Can J Public Health; 2004; 95(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 15362473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pap test results. Responding to Bethesda system reports.
Colgan TJ
Can Fam Physician; 2001 Jul; 47():1425-30. PubMed ID: 11494930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Would female inmates accept Papanicolaou smear screening if it was offered to them during their incarceration?
Martin RE
CMAJ; 2000 Mar; 162(5):657-8. PubMed ID: 10738451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of a prison cervical cancer screening program in British Columbia.
Martin RE
Can J Public Health; 1998; 89(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 9926496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer screening.
Katz A
Can Fam Physician; 1998 Aug; 44():1661-5. PubMed ID: 9721422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer screening performed by a nurse. Evaluation in family practice.
Thommasen H; Lenci P; Brake I; Anderson G
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Nov; 42():2179-83. PubMed ID: 8939319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.
Parboosingh EJ; Anderson G; Clarke EA; Inhaber S; Kaegi E; Mills C; Mao Y; Root L; Stuart G; Stachenko S
CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(12):1847-53. PubMed ID: 8653644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compliance in screening programmes. High compliance essential in cervical screening programme..
Jenkins D; Gallivan S; Sherlaw-Johnson C
BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6929):652. PubMed ID: 8148720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of death from cervical cancer among native Indian women in British Columbia.
Band PR; Gallagher RP; Threlfall WJ; Hislop TG; Deschamps M; Smith J
CMAJ; 1992 Dec; 147(12):1802-4. PubMed ID: 1458421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive cancer of the cervix in British Columbia: a review of the demography and screening histories of 437 cases seen from 1985-1988.
Anderson GH; Benedet JL; Le Riche JC; Matisic JP; Thompson JE
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 1603476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical cancer incidence in British Columbia: Predicting effects of changes from Pap to human papillomavirus screening and of changes in screening participation.
Coldman A; van Niekerk D; Smith L; Ogilvie G
J Med Screen; 2017 Dec; 24(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 27810984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
