These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups. Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink. Kawahara JI; Kihara K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to keep attention from straying: get engaged! Folk CL; Ester EF; Troemel K Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 19145022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture. Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Setting semantics: conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention. Goodhew SC; Kendall W; Ferber S; Pratt J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1577-89. PubMed ID: 24824982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli. Reeck C; LaBar KS; Egner T J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 May; 24(5):1113-26. PubMed ID: 22360642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Anderson BA; Folk CL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Object-based selection is contingent on attentional control settings. Taylor JE; Rajsic J; Pratt J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 26902247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention. Kawahara J; Yanase K; Kitazaki M J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23161003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. Grubert A; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings. Glickman M; Lamy D Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What is top-down about contingent capture? Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]