These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16035345)

  • 41. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing.
    Olivers CN; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Contingent orienting or contingent capture: a size singleton matching the target-distractor size relation cannot capture attention.
    Du F; Yin Y; Qi Y; Zhang K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1011-8. PubMed ID: 24356927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task.
    Irons JL; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):862-75. PubMed ID: 23444082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal visual attention.
    Wyble B; Bowman H; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 19331491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):975-988. PubMed ID: 28303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):257-77. PubMed ID: 23151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images.
    Wyble B; Folk C; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 23163786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
    Ansorge U; Heumann M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Masking of a first target in the attentional blink attenuates the P3 to the first target and delays the P3 to the second target.
    Brisson B; Bourassa MÈ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):611-9. PubMed ID: 24635583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 29959614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.
    Landau AN; Bentin S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 18665728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture.
    Munneke J; Fahrenfort JJ; Sutterer D; Theeuwes J; Awh E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117562. PubMed ID: 33189931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.