These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16035347)

  • 1. A three year follow-up of posterior doxadent restorations.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Swed Dent J; 2005; 29(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 16035347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A calcium aluminate cement as restorative material in Class V cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 15506688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2003 Aug; 61(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 14582592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porosity evaluation and pore size distribution of a novel directly placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Thompson JY; Bayne SC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):987-95. PubMed ID: 15501328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 16580114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional change of a calcium aluminate cement for posterior restorations in aqueous and dry media.
    Berglund A; Hulterström AK; Gruffman E; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 16154630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 16430017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Sancakli HS; Topçubaşi M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.