These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16035348)

  • 21. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator.
    Att W; Grigoriadou M; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 17371566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot-inlay FPDs.
    Bindl A; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 14714847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Static implant loading caused by as-cast metal and ceramic-veneered superstructures.
    Karl M; Rosch S; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 15798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Spiekermann H; Wichmann M; Andreas SK; Eitner S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 18546767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Load-bearing capacity of implant-supported, tooth-supported, and combined zirconia-fixed dental prostheses.
    Sarafidou K; Stiesch M; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Kohorst P
    Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 21778885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.
    Tripodakis AP; Strub JR; Kappert HF; Witkowski S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang SH; Chen ST
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 20059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparisons of tactile thresholds between implant-supported fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures.
    Garrett NR; Hasse AL; Kapur KK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 1307010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
    Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture strength of three-unit fixed partial denture cores (Y-TZP) with different connector dimension and design.
    Bahat Z; Mahmood DJ; Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J; 2009; 33(3):149-59. PubMed ID: 19994565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Load transmission in implant superstructures supported by natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants. A preliminary report.
    Hobkirk JA; Tanner SR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Mar; 3(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 8603151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.