BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036190)

  • 1. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
    Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
    Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?
    Franchini M; Cianferoni L; Lippi G; Calonaci F; Calzolari S; Mazzini M; Florio P
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1499-502. PubMed ID: 18930457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.
    Nichols M; Carter JF; Fylstra DL; Childers M;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 16962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16527710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
    Thiel JA; Carson GD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a health economic literature review.
    Toronto Health Economic and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(22):1-25. PubMed ID: 24228085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.
    Ubeda A; Labastida R; Dexeus S
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 15237011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.
    Carney PI; Yao J; Lin J; Law A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 28157426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cost effects of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic female sterilization].
    Rajecki M; Blomqvist S; Väisänen S; Jokinen E; Kyöstilä SL; Nord-Saari M; Rissanen P; Hurskainen R
    Duodecim; 2014; 130(8):823-31. PubMed ID: 24822333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysteroscopic sterilization success in outpatient vs office setting is not affected by patient or procedural characteristics.
    Anderson TL; Yunker AC; Scheib SA; Callahan TL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):858-63. PubMed ID: 23891205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion: sterilization after failed laparoscopic or abdominal approaches.
    Podolsky ML; Desai NA; Waters TP; Nyirjesy P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 2):513-5. PubMed ID: 18239004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
    Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopic sterilization in patients with a Mirena intrauterine device: transition from extended interval to permanent contraception.
    Tatalovich JM; Anderson TL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 20226413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Sciarra JJ; Keith L
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 22(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 8524539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysteroscopic sterilization in the office setting.
    Hodges KR; Swaim LS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2013 Dec; 40(4):671-85. PubMed ID: 24286995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.