These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036474)

  • 1. Integrating numerical indices of structure and function to optimize diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in screening for glaucoma.
    Sponsel WE
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 16036474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of community-based glaucoma screening using Frequency Doubling Technology and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography.
    Robin TA; Müller A; Rait J; Keeffe JE; Taylor HR; Mukesh BN
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 12(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 16036475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity and specificity.
    Cox TA
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Sep; 110(9):1858; author reply 1858. PubMed ID: 13129898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
    Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical coherence tomography measurement of nerve fiber layer thickness and the likelihood of a visual field defect.
    Ophir A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 135(5):744; author reply 744-5. PubMed ID: 12719100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
    Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing the use of frequency doubling technology perimetry in community vision screenings.
    Nehmad L; Madonna RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):559-65. PubMed ID: 18594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.
    Fayers T; Strouthidis NG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1973-80. PubMed ID: 17662455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma detection using different Stratus optical coherence tomography protocols.
    Hougaard JL; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17343690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma.
    Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Pajarín AB; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pueyo V
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):354-359. PubMed ID: 18078851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is scanning laser polarimetry ready for clinical practice?
    Weinreb RN; Medeiros FA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):674-6. PubMed ID: 17386273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma.
    Parikh RS; Parikh S; Sekhar GC; Kumar RS; Prabakaran S; Babu JG; Thomas R
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2238-43. PubMed ID: 17561260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.
    Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
    Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Ralli M; Caprioli J
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 125(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 17846355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cataract and glaucoma case detection for Vision 2020 programs in Africa: an evaluation of 6 possible screening tests.
    Cook C; Cockburn N; van der Merwe J; Ehrlich R
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):557-62. PubMed ID: 19745671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial.
    Tóth M; Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 17700289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry, scanning laser tomography, and their combination in a glaucoma screening trial.
    Tóth M; Kóthy P; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 19092459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.