These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1603649)

  • 1. Audiovisual integration in perception of real words.
    Dekle DJ; Fowler CA; Funnell MG
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Apr; 51(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 1603649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading.
    Baart M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 471(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 20080146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.
    Fowler CA; Dekle DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):816-28. PubMed ID: 1834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anchoring effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Shigeno S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2853-61. PubMed ID: 12083219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception.
    Rosenblum LD; Saldaña HM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):318-31. PubMed ID: 8934846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alignment to visual speech information.
    Miller RM; Sanchez K; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1614-25. PubMed ID: 20675805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric contributions to the integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception.
    Baynes K; Funnell MG; Fowler CA
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jun; 55(6):633-41. PubMed ID: 8058451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A sex difference in visual influence on heard speech.
    Irwin JR; Whalen DH; Fowler CA
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 May; 68(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 16933423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.
    van Linden S; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 18085958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception.
    Brancazio L; Brancazio L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):445-63. PubMed ID: 15161378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
    Brown VA; Hedayati M; Zanger A; Mayn S; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso N; Strand JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207160. PubMed ID: 30418995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments.
    Saldaña HM; Rosenblum LD
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 8414899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.
    Brancazio L; Best CT; Fowler CA
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16922061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of intersensory synchrony in audiovisual speech: not that special.
    Vroomen J; Stekelenburg JJ
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 21035795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrimination tests of visually influenced syllables.
    Rosenblum LD; Saldaña HM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 1437479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.
    Myerson J; Spehar B; Tye-Murray N; Van Engen K; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):346-54. PubMed ID: 26474981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.