940 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036649)
1. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research ethics committees--the future.
Harris J
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):123-38. PubMed ID: 15282930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
Dickens BM
J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?
Brody H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does uncle Sam really want you? A response to "Rethinking research Ethics" by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB 5:1).
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W22-3. PubMed ID: 16036645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
