647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036658)
1. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Waste not, want not: cognitive impairment should not preclude research participation.
Hougham GW
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):36-7; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Context is key for voluntary and informed consent.
Sears JM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):47-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):34-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics.
McGuire AL; McCullough LB
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues of recruitment and enrollment of critically ill and injured patients for research.
Richmond TS; Ulrich C
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 17978608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does informed consent have an expiry date? A critical reappraisal of informed consent as a process.
Helgesson G; Eriksson S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 21223612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.
Cook-Deegan RM
Cerebrum; 2000; 2(2):73-91. PubMed ID: 15986545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovation to research: some transitional obstacles in critical care units.
Morgenweck CJ
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S172-7. PubMed ID: 12626964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research column: protection of children as subjects in research.
Nelson AE
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 2003; 20(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 12776262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsafe presumptions in clinical research.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 12189077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
