323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036662)
1. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics.
Sharp RR; Yarborough M
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research ethics committees--the future.
Harris J
Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):123-38. PubMed ID: 15282930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?
Brody H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Harris J
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():77-91. PubMed ID: 16285118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Undue inducement' as coercive offers.
McGregor J
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 16179302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting.
Justo L
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to withdraw from research.
Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gather ye shibboleths while ye may.
Fost N
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 16179297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Waste not, want not: cognitive impairment should not preclude research participation.
Hougham GW
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):36-7; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
