These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036664)
1. Histories of mistrust and protectionism: disadvantaged minority groups and human-subject research policies. List JM Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):53-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics. McGuire AL; McCullough LB Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 16036642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Vulnerability from a global medicine perspective. Jotkowitz AB Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):62-3; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice. London AJ Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Additional thoughts on rethinking research ethics. Sharp RR; Yarborough M Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):40-2; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research versus innovation: real differences. Morreim H Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Trust, understanding and utopia in the research setting. Justo L Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):56-8; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adolescent decisional autonomy in research: issues in translating research into policy. Campbell AT Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):78-80. PubMed ID: 16179326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vulnerability to influence: a two-way street. Henderson GE; Davis AM; King NM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):50-2; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Some questionable premises about research ethics. Macklin R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Sacred" research practices we may want to change. Howe EG J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 10633278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics. Simmerling M; Schwegler B Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The invisible vulnerable: the economically and educationally disadvantaged subjects of clinical research. Stone TH J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 12762108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research involving the homeless: arguments against payment-in-kind (PinK). Schonfeld TL; Brown JS; Weniger M; Gordon B IRB; 2003; 25(5):17-20. PubMed ID: 14870741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: precautions against discrimination in medical research. Silvers A Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):56-7; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vulnerability in human subject research: existential state, not category designation. Finder SG Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):68-70; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The history and moral foundations of human-subject research. Blustein J Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 86(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 17251690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]