167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036700)
1. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 16036700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.
Wolpe PR; Foster KR; Langleben DD
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):40-8. PubMed ID: 20945266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can we scan for truth in a society of liars?
Buller T
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):58-60; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promise and perils" five years later.
Hyman SE
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):49-50. PubMed ID: 20945267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual use and the "moral taint" problem.
Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):52-3; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Orwellian threat to emerging neurodiagnostic technologies.
Fins JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):56-8; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Searching the brain: the Fourth Amendment implications of brain-based deception detection devices.
Boire RG
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):62-3; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Looking for the lie: scientists are using brain imaging and other tools as new kinds of lie detectors. But trickier even than finding the source of deception might be navigating a world without it.
Henig RM
N Y Times Mag; 2006 Feb; ():47-53, 76, 80. PubMed ID: 17080568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The prospects for neuro-exceptionalism: transparent lies, naked minds.
Wachbroit R
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18236325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Keeping an open mind: what legal safeguards are needed?
Glenn LM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):60-1; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
Simpson JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19092066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spy versus spy.
Green RM
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):53-4; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Looking for truth and finding lies: the prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception.
Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes CJ
Neurocase; 2008; 14(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 18569733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Risk assessment by means of polygraphy].
Brand EF
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 19434571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The brain doesn't lie.
Fischbach RL; Fischbach GD
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):54-5; discussion W5. PubMed ID: 16036704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuroimaging: revolutionary research tool or a post-modern phrenology?
Kennedy D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):19; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can bad science be good evidence? Neuroscience, lie detection, and beyond.
Schauer F
Cornell Law Rev; 2010 Sep; 95(6):1191-220. PubMed ID: 20939147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical and regulatory challenges in psychophysiology and neuroscience-based technology for determining behavior.
Shamoo AE
Account Res; 2010 Jan; 17(1):8-29. PubMed ID: 20094928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroethical theories.
Häyry M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Apr; 19(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 20226100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
Schauer F
Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
