390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16036777)
1. Comparison of adhesive properties of five different prosthetic materials used in hernioplasty.
Kayaoglu HA; Ozkan N; Hazinedaroglu SM; Ersoy OF; Erkek AB; Koseoglu RD
J Invest Surg; 2005; 18(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 16036777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevention of intraabdominal adhesions produced by polypropylene mesh.
Besim H; Yalçin Y; Hamamcí O; Arslan K; Soníşik M; Korkmaz A; Erdoğan S
Eur Surg Res; 2002; 34(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 12077511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.
Schreinemacher MH; van Barneveld KW; Dikmans RE; Gijbels MJ; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4202-9. PubMed ID: 23749270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interposition of polyglactin mesh does not prevent adhesion formation between viscera and polypropylene mesh.
de Vries Reilingh TS; van Goor H; Koppe MJ; Bodegom ME; Hendriks T; Bleichrodt RP
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17481981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adhesion formation and reherniation differ between meshes used for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Sikkink CJ; Vries de Reilingh TS; Malyar AW; Jansen JA; Bleichrodt RP; van Goor H
Hernia; 2006 Jun; 10(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 16482401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention of adhesion formation with use of sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane in a rat model of ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh--a randomized, controlled study.
Hooker GD; Taylor BM; Driman DK
Surgery; 1999 Feb; 125(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 10026756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh.
Matthews BD; Mostafa G; Carbonell AM; Joels CS; Kercher KW; Austin C; Norton HJ; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2005 Feb; 123(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15680383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects.
Jenkins SD; Klamer TW; Parteka JJ; Condon RE
Surgery; 1983 Aug; 94(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 6224307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of different barriers using an incisional hernia model.
van 't Riet M; de Vos van Steenwijk PJ; Bonthuis F; Marquet RL; Steyerberg EW; Jeekel J; Bonjer HJ
Ann Surg; 2003 Jan; 237(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 12496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study).
Alimoglu O; Akcakaya A; Sahin M; Unlu Y; Ozkan OV; Sanli E; Eryilmaz R
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):725-8. PubMed ID: 12828071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh.
Matthews BD; Pratt BL; Pollinger HS; Backus CL; Kercher KW; Sing RF; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2003 Oct; 114(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 14559437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of Polypropylene versus Parietex composite®, Vicryl® and Ultrapro® meshes, regarding the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions.
Biondo-Simões ML; Carvalho LB; Conceição LT; Santos KB; Schiel WA; Arantes M; Silveira TD; Magri JC; Gomes FF
Acta Cir Bras; 2017 Feb; 32(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 28300876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Intraperitoneal ventral hernia plasty: the comparison of prosthetic materials].
Egiev VN; Liadov VK; Bogomazova SIu
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2010; (10):36-41. PubMed ID: 21169928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines.
Amid PK; Shulman AG; Lichtenstein IL; Sostrin S; Young J; Hakakha M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Mar; 28(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 8077252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.
Burger JW; Halm JA; Wijsmuller AR; ten Raa S; Jeekel J
Surg Endosc; 2006 Aug; 20(8):1320-5. PubMed ID: 16865616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peritoneal adhesions to prosthetic materials: choice of mesh for incisional hernia repair.
Vrijland WW; Bonthuis F; Steyerberg EW; Marquet RL; Jeekel J; Bonjer HJ
Surg Endosc; 2000 Oct; 14(10):960-3. PubMed ID: 11080412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An experimental study of the adhesive potential of different meshes.
Baykal A; Yorganci K; Sokmensuer C; Hamaloglu E; Renda N; Sayek I
Eur J Surg; 2000 Jun; 166(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 10890547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peritoneal effects of prosthetic meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects: monitoring adhesions by sequential laparoscopy.
Bellón JM; Rodríguez M; García-Honduvilla N; Pascual G; Gómez Gil V; Buján J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Apr; 17(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 17484641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair.
van't Riet M; Burger JW; Bonthuis F; Jeekel J; Bonjer HJ
Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):681-5. PubMed ID: 15026899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
