161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16037958)
41. Chronic exposure to a 1.439 GHz electromagnetic field used for cellular phones does not promote N-ethylnitrosourea induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats.
Shirai T; Kawabe M; Ichihara T; Fujiwara O; Taki M; Watanabe S; Wake K; Yamanaka Y; Imaida K; Asamoto M; Tamano S
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jan; 26(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15605402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Distortion product otoacoustic emission findings in Behçet's disease and rheumatoid arthritis.
Bayazit YA; Yilmaz M; Gunduz B; Altinyay S; Kemaloglu YK; Onder M; Gurer MA
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 17409782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exposure of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to electromagnetic fields associated with cellular phones leads to chromosomal instability.
Mashevich M; Folkman D; Kesar A; Barbul A; Korenstein R; Jerby E; Avivi L
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Feb; 24(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 12524674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Investigation of potential effects of cellular phones on human auditory function by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Janssen T; Boege P; von Mikusch-Buchberg J; Raczek J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1241-7. PubMed ID: 15807013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Lack of effects of 1439 MHz electromagnetic near field exposure on the blood-brain barrier in immature and young rats.
Kuribayashi M; Wang J; Fujiwara O; Doi Y; Nabae K; Tamano S; Ogiso T; Asamoto M; Shirai T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Oct; 26(7):578-88. PubMed ID: 16142770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission: early detection in deferoxamine induced ototoxicity.
Delehaye E; Capobianco S; Bertetto IB; Meloni F
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Jun; 35(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 17869044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift.
Kim JS; Nam EC; Park SI
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16213939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Scalp localization of human auditory cortical activity modified by GSM electromagnetic fields.
Maby E; Jeannes Rle B; Faucon G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Jul; 82(7):465-72. PubMed ID: 16882618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. In vitro effects of GSM modulated radiofrequency fields on human immune cells.
Tuschl H; Novak W; Molla-Djafari H
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):188-96. PubMed ID: 16342197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.
Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Mobile phone effects on children's event-related oscillatory EEG during an auditory memory task.
Krause CM; Björnberg CH; Pesonen M; Hulten A; Liesivuori T; Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Laine M; Hämäläinen H
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Jun; 82(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 16846979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. No effect of an UMTS mobile phone-like electromagnetic field of 1.97 GHz on human attention and reaction time.
Unterlechner M; Sauter C; Schmid G; Zeitlhofer J
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Feb; 29(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 17957702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of weak mobile phone - electromagnetic fields (GSM, UMTS) on event related potentials and cognitive functions.
Kleinlogel H; Dierks T; Koenig T; Lehmann H; Minder A; Berz R
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Sep; 29(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 18421712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Exposure to GSM 900 MHz electromagnetic fields affects cerebral cytochrome c oxidase activity.
Ammari M; Lecomte A; Sakly M; Abdelmelek H; de-Seze R
Toxicology; 2008 Aug; 250(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 18585429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions as non-invasive biomarkers and predictors of soman-induced central neurotoxicity: a preliminary study.
Job A; Baille V; Dorandeu F; Pouyatos B; Foquin A; Delacour C; Denis J; Carpentier P
Toxicology; 2007 Sep; 238(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 17618030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of GSM-like radiofrequency on distortion product otoacoustic emissions of rabbits: comparison of infants versus adults.
Budak GG; Muluk NB; Budak B; Oztürk GG; Apan A; Seyhan N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 73(8):1143-7. PubMed ID: 19477533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Absence of contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in fibromyalgia syndrome.
Gunduz B; Bayazit YA; Celenk F; Saridoğan C; Guclu AG; Orcan E; Meray J
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Oct; 122(10):1047-51. PubMed ID: 18318918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effects of Piezosurgery on the cochlear outer hair cells.
Salami A; Dellepiane M; Ralli G; Crippa B; Mora R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 May; 129(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 18720072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
