These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038072)
1. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard. Veatch RM Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York. Caffera SM Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan. Gasner MR N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective. McNoble DJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of families in medical decisions. Minow M Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy. Adamson EH Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study. Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients. Dippel DL Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion. Meilaender G Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deja vu all over again: the false dichotomy between sanctity of life and quality of life. Cantor NL Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 17099994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Refusal of hydration and nutrition: irrelevance of the "artificial" vs "natural" distinction. Truog RD; Cochrane TI Arch Intern Med; 2005 Dec 12-26; 165(22):2574-6. PubMed ID: 16344412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity. Swidler RN N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Wendland case: on families and fantasies. Nelson LJ Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(2):8, 12. PubMed ID: 16175728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care. Procaccino JA Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives. Horttor BJ N D Law Rev; 1998; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking. Fader JF MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care. Zuckerman C Generations; 1999; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]