These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038072)

  • 21. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Erring too far on the side of life: deja vu all over again in the Schiavo saga.
    Allen W
    Stetson Law Rev; 2005; 35(1):123-45. PubMed ID: 17099996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
    Kramer IR
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
    Saperstein D; Mishkin D
    CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Culture wars in New York state: ongoing political resistance by religious groups to the Family Health Care Decisions Act.
    Freer J; Wear S
    Christ Bioeth; 2002 Apr; 8(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 12956144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The physician as a conscientious objector.
    Bleich JD
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):245-65. PubMed ID: 15868672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. End of life decision-making for patients with dementia.
    Francis LP
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2001; ():4, 7. PubMed ID: 15584185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
    Calder M
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Considering the boundaries of decision-making authority: An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46.
    Richards B
    J Bioeth Inq; 2019 Jun; 16(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 31134416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
    New Jersey
    N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients in a permanent vegetative state: changing tack.
    Constable C
    Bioethics; 2012 Mar; 26(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 21039688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
    Ouellette AR
    Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lessons from Cruzan.
    Meisel A
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Substituted judgments in the absence of surrogates.
    Sadovnikoff N; Jurchak M
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):2467-8. PubMed ID: 17885404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Best interest: a philosophical critique.
    Holm S; Edgar A
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 18642084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cruzan: clear and convincing? How can they?
    Busalacchi P
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 2228592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A moral dilemma: the role of judicial intervention in withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration.
    Peccarelli AM
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):537-68. PubMed ID: 16622961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. US State Regulation of Decisions for Pregnant Women Without Decisional Capacity.
    DeMartino ES; Sperry BP; Doyle CK; Chor J; Kramer DB; Dudzinski DM; Mueller PS
    JAMA; 2019 Apr; 321(16):1629-1631. PubMed ID: 31012920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.