235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038076)
1. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
Meilaender G
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawal of treatment for minors in a persistent vegetative state: parents should decide.
Massie AM
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):173-218. PubMed ID: 12645558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Peters PG
Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nancy Cruzan in China.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico.
Schwartz RL
N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan.
Gasner MR
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitution and the right to die.
Peters PG
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
Veatch RM
Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Lessons from Nancy Cruzan.
Fairman RP
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 1728924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
Ouellette AR
Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
Johnson SH
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Death and dying in America: Schiavo's implications.
Wolf SM
Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 16050306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
