BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038855)

  • 1. A normative database of lumbar spine ranges of motion.
    Troke M; Moore AP; Maillardet FJ; Cheek E
    Man Ther; 2005 Aug; 10(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 16038855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new, comprehensive normative database of lumbar spine ranges of motion.
    Troke M; Moore AP; Maillardet FJ; Hough A; Cheek E
    Clin Rehabil; 2001 Aug; 15(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 11518438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
    Drake JD; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 18234402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength.
    Roussel N; Nijs J; Truijen S; Breugelmans S; Claes I; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Apr; 87(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 16571400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer with a new skin fixation system when used on the thoracic spine.
    Troke M; Moore AP; Cheek E
    Man Ther; 1998 Feb; 3(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11487298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional in vivo measurement of lumbar spine segmental motion.
    Ochia RS; Inoue N; Renner SM; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2073-8. PubMed ID: 16915091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-operator and inter-operator reliability of the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer with a new skin fixation system.
    Troke M; Moore AP; Cheek E
    Man Ther; 1996 Mar; 1(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 11386844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Video based measurement of sagittal range of spinal motion in young and older adults.
    Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
    Man Ther; 2009 Dec; 14(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19201248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.
    Christensen HW; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
    Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited range-of-motion lumbar extension strength training.
    Graves JE; Pollock ML; Leggett SH; Carpenter DM; Fix CK; Fulton MN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Jan; 24(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 1532222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of measures obtained from the OSI CA-6000 Spine Motion Analyzer for lumbar spinal motion.
    Schuit D; Petersen C; Johnson R; Levine P; Knecht H; Goldberg D
    Man Ther; 1997 Nov; 2(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 11440534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Jegede KA; Miller CP; Bible JE; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2346-53. PubMed ID: 21358469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.