129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038855)
21. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Fuhr AW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Oct; 23(8):521-30. PubMed ID: 11050608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of posture on the range of axial rotation and coupled lateral flexion of the thoracic spine.
Edmondston SJ; Aggerholm M; Elfving S; Flores N; Ng C; Smith R; Netto K
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007; 30(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 17416273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of asymptomatic subjects' thoracolumbar range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D; Hayes KW
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 20(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 7987381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements.
Alaranta H; Hurri H; Heliövaara M; Soukka A; Harju R
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1994 Sep; 26(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 7801064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ZooMS: a non invasive analysis of global and metameric movement of the lumbar spine.
Andreoni G; Negrini S; Ciavarro GL; Santambrogio GC
Eura Medicophys; 2005 Mar; 41(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16175766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gross range of motion in the cervical spine: the effects of osteopathic muscle energy technique in asymptomatic subjects.
Burns DK; Wells MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Mar; 106(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 16585381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children.
Lynch-Caris T; Majeske KD; Brelin-Fornari J; Nashi S
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 18675420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of fatigue failure responses of old versus middle-aged lumbar motion segments in simulated flexed lifting.
Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D; Landoll J; Matkovic V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1832-9. PubMed ID: 17762290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults.
Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009; 32(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 19362231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain.
Al-Eisa E; Egan D; Deluzio K; Wassersug R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(3):E71-9. PubMed ID: 16449891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical spine range of motion in children with posterior occipitocervical arthrodesis.
Wills BP; Jencikova-Celerin L; Dormans JP
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 17065940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device.
Post RB; Leferink VJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Apr; 124(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 14968367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of sacro occipital technique category II blocking on spinal ranges of motion: a case series.
Hochman JI
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(9):719-23. PubMed ID: 16326243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Normative values for active lumbar range of motion in children.
Kondratek M; Krauss J; Stiller C; Olson R
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 17700353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
