These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16038917)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of the shear behaviour adjacent to an axially loaded implant.
    Swider P; Pedrono A; Mouzin O; Søballe K; Bechtold JE
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1873-82. PubMed ID: 16038917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
    Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nondestructive measurements of implant-bone interface shear modulus and effects of implant geometry in pull-out tests.
    Berzins A; Shah B; Weinans H; Sumner DR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Mar; 34(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 9086403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement.
    Voigt C; Klöhn C; Bader R; von Salis-Soglio G; Scholz R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Apr; 52(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17408381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
    Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.
    Thomas KA; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Oct; 19(8):875-901. PubMed ID: 3880349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants.
    Clemow AJ; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Koeneman J; Anderson J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Jan; 15(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 7348706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of parathyroid hormone treatment on implant fixation.
    Daugaard H
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4317. PubMed ID: 21893015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-resolution magnetic resonance flow imaging in a model of porous bone-implant interface.
    Conroy MJ; Pédrono A; Bechtold JE; Søballe K; Ambard D; Swider P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 16735190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog.
    Brånemark R; Ohrnell LO; Skalak R; Carlsson L; Brånemark PI
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Jan; 16(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9565075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of biomechanical behavior on osseointegration of implant with SLAffinity.
    Chu KT; Cheng HY; Pan YN; Chen SY; Ou KL
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Apr; 101(4):1195-200. PubMed ID: 23349074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs.
    Søballe K; Hansen ES; Brockstedt-Rasmussen H; Hjortdal VE; Juhl GI; Pedersen CM; Hvid I; Bünger C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):300-7. PubMed ID: 1657476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential effect of a bone morphogenetic protein-7 (OP-1) on primary and revision loaded, stable implants with allograft.
    Søballe K; Jensen TB; Mouzin O; Kidder L; Bechtold JE
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 15505829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
    Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational investigation of fibrin mechanical and damage properties at the interface between native cartilage and implant.
    Vahdati A; Zhao Y; Ovaert TC; Wagner DR
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 Nov; 134(11):111004. PubMed ID: 23387786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Researches on biomechanics of micro-implant-bone interface and optimum design of micro implant's neck].
    Deng F; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Song JL; Fan Y
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jul; 38(4):701-4. PubMed ID: 17718446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth factor stimulation of bone healing. Effects on osteoblasts, osteomies, and implants fixation.
    Lind M
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1998 Oct; 283():2-37. PubMed ID: 9856074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.